Cases 11 - 20 of 43,434
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Harris v. LAZ Parking LTD, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
Amy Harris
Defendant:
LAZ Parking LTD, LLC and LAZ Karp Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Taylor v. Safe Auto Trucking LLC
as 3:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Robert Taylor
Defendant:
Safe Auto Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Taber v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00885
Plaintiff:
Marisa Taber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TD Bank, N.A. et al v. Bartkiewicz et al
as 3:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
TD Bank, N.A. and TD Private Client Wealth, LLC
Defendant:
Brett T. Bartkiewicz, Gregg Desmarais, Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cubic v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Jose Cubic
Defendant:
Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United Ohio Insurance Company v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
United Ohio Insurance Company
Defendant:
Ricky Miller, Jr., Lanette Cunningham-Lamb, Kevon Huntley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
GOODRICH v. Dividend, a division of Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
LIONEL GOODRICH
Defendant:
Dividend, a division of Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
